[c-nsp] Quick question regarding BGP route churn & PRP-2

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon Jul 8 08:41:09 EDT 2013

On Monday, July 08, 2013 12:57:39 PM Saku Ytti wrote:

> I don't feel I'm in the position to make the decision for
> my customer when they should be able to receive unstable
> route and when not.

I am of a similar view.

I never supported RFD way back then (despite the fact that 
with our old satellite links of the day, I was a victim), 
and don't support it today either.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130708/8e282179/attachment.sig>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list