[c-nsp] MPLS down to the CPE

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Jul 9 10:11:34 EDT 2013

On Tuesday, July 09, 2013 01:30:02 PM Adam Vitkovsky wrote:

> It very much appears they used IGP to propagate labels,
> they are just called segments.
> Looks like it's using the same computations as rLFA in
> order to build the tunnel towards the protection node.
> Now with this and routing-header in IPv6 do we really
> need LDP for IPv6 (other than the targeted LDP
> sessions)?
> I'd like to play with this

Yeah, me too :-).

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130709/5ca3e631/attachment.sig>

More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list