[c-nsp] Private IP in SP Core

[Gordon Bryan]

Andrey/Andrew,
 
It will be a very small network to begin with - single P router, single PE router and a number of switches for hosting. This will hopefuly quickly scale to a dual-site configuration with two P routers and two PE routers but even then it will still be small in the grand scheme of things.
 
In terms of Internet services, I was planning on delivering these in an Internet VRF and there is no requirement for a full routing table yet 
 
Thanks
 
Gordon


________________________________
From: Andrey Petrenko <andy.petrenko at gmail.com>
To: Andrew Miehs <andrew at 2sheds.de> 
Cc: Gordon Bryan <cisco_resource at yahoo.co.uk>; Cisco NSP <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net> 
Sent: Sunday, 10 March 2013, 22:28
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Private IP in SP Core


How many upstream you planned? Size of you network?

-- 
With best regards,
Andrey 'sshd' Petrenko
xmmp\gtalk: andy.petrenko at gmail.com
skype: andy.petrenko
web: http://sshd.by/

11.03.2013, в 1:12, Andrew Miehs <andrew at 2sheds.de> написал(а):



>
>Sent from a mobile device
>
>On 11/03/2013, at 8:44, Gordon Bryan <cisco_resource at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>Hi Group,
>>
>
>>
>I'm heading towards the final stages of planning a new MPLS core network and I'm currently stuck in two minds between public or private addressing for the core.
>>
>
>>
>Where do you plan to store the Internet routing table? In a vrf or global?
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>