[c-nsp] BGP Route Dampening

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 02:25:21PM +0200, Saku Ytti wrote:
> On (2013-03-11 12:18 +0000), Nick Hilliard wrote:
> 
> > RIPE's current view on RFD is:
> > 
> > http://www.ripe.net/ripe/docs/ripe-580
> 
> I don't believe this is generally supported by RIPE community, I don't
> understand how it became RIPE-580 so fast.

"it was discussed in the relevant WG (routing-wg), got some support,
and no sustained opposition".

So whoever does not support that didn't voice his opinion...

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130311/94f21344/attachment.sig>