[c-nsp] Processing one VLAN received on a Q-in-Q port

Pete Lumbis alumbis at gmail.com
Mon Mar 25 06:13:22 EDT 2013


On the 6k I think EVC configuration can only be accomplishes on ES+ (maybe
ES-20?) or with Sup2t

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/15.1SY/config_guide/sup2T/ethernet_virtual_connection.html

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Robert Williams <Robert at custodiandc.com>wrote:

> Hi Adam,
>
> Many thanks for that, it reads like it would do exactly what we need,
> however the switch doesn't accept Ethernet encapsulation:
>
> (config-if)#service instance 10 ethernet
> (config-if-srv)#ethernet ?
>   lmi  Configure ether lmi parameters
> (config-if-srv)#?
> Ethernet EFP configuration commands:
>   default   Set a command to its defaults
>   ethernet  Configure ether lmi parameters
>   exit      Exit from ETHER EFP configuration mode
>   no        Negate a command or set its defaults
>
> It's running Version 12.2(33)SXJ3 / AdvIP Services and the line card is  a
> 6708-10GE with a DFC3CXL
>
> Any other pointers or maybe suggestions as to IOS versions / Line cards
> with or without this feature?
>
> Cheers!
>
>
>
>
> Robert Williams
> Custodian Data Centre
> Email: Robert at CustodianDC.com
> http://www.CustodianDC.com
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adam Vitkovsky [mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk]
> Sent: 25 March 2013 08:42
> To: Robert Williams; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: RE: [c-nsp] Processing one VLAN received on a Q-in-Q port
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> I believe you should be able to use the following config for the VLAN 10.
>
> interface Gi1/1
>  service instance 10
>  ethernet  encapsulation dot1q 10
>  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
>  bridge-domain 40
>
> interface Vlan 40
>  ip address 1.1.1.1 255.255.255.0
>
> check out the following series:
>
> http://ccie-in-3-months.blogspot.com/2009/09/evc-flexible-service-mapping.html
>
> http://ccie-in-3-months.blogspot.com/2009/06/evc-flexible-frame-matching.html
>
> http://ccie-in-3-months.blogspot.com/2009/06/evc-flexible-vlan-tag-rewrite.html
>
>
> adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net [mailto:
> cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Robert Williams
> Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 10:24 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] Processing one VLAN received on a Q-in-Q port
>
> Hi Guys,
>
> Hopefully someone here can assist with this, I need to process locally a
> VLAN which is received into our network from another service provider via
> one of our Q-in-Q ports.
>
> Currently we use a Q-in-Q port to double-tag all traffic we receive from
> the other provider, then transport it across our network and give it back
> to them where they then break it out on their own switch at one of our
> other facilities. We do this across a series of 6500/720XL chassis.
>
> This works fine, however, we now need to bring up an additional BGP
> session with the other provider, but the session has to be over the same
> physical port as we use for the Q-in-Q transport. To put it into a logical
> sentence, we need the port facing the other provider at the edge of our
> network to:
>
> “Double-tag VLANs 1-9 and 11-4094 with SPvLAN ID 500 - but switch VLAN 10
> locally without double-tagging it”
>
> We will then bring up the BGP session on VLAN 10, but allow all the others
> to pass across our network with the additional double-tag.
>
> All packets we receive from the other SP are single-tagged, including the
> VLAN on which we need to inject our BGP session.
>
> I’m not sure what other information may be relevant so please just ask me
> anything. If this is not possible on the 720 platform, then we will
> consider deploying either a 2T or ASR9k at this location to meet the
> requirement (both are currently being looked at as options for upgrading
> our 720 units anyway). However, it would be nice if the 2T can do it as the
> ASR may be overkill considering the other requirements of the site.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
>
>
> Robert Williams
> Custodian Data Centre
> Email: Robert at CustodianDC.com
> http://www.CustodianDC.com
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list