[c-nsp] IP LFA in ring topology

[Waris Sagheer (waris)]

Adam,
I suppose you mean MLDP based MVPN support on ME3800X/ME3600X/ASR903, the feature is in roadmap for second half of next year.

Best Regards,

[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]

Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
Service Provider Access Group
waris at cisco.com<mailto:waris at cisco.com>
Phone: +1 408 853 6682
Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

CCIE - 19901


<http://www.cisco.com/>



[Think before you print.] Think before you print.

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html



From: adam vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>>
Date: Sunday, May 5, 2013 4:43 AM
To: "mark.tinka at seacom.mu<mailto:mark.tinka at seacom.mu>" <mark.tinka at seacom.mu<mailto:mark.tinka at seacom.mu>>, "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IP LFA in ring topology

Yes Mark, you are absolutely right. With the advent of NG-MVPN we can
finally bye bye the PIM in our backbones.
Though now with MPLS all the way to access/pre-aggregation layer I'd like to
see MVPN support there as well, namely ME3600x/-cx/3800x platforms.

adam
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Tinka [mailto:mark.tinka at seacom.mu]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2013 10:59 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Cc: Adam Vitkovsky; 'Saku Ytti'
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] IP LFA in ring topology

On Friday, November 30, 2012 10:46:47 AM Adam Vitkovsky
wrote:

And that would be AWESOME, I didn't quite get the idea of creating
other RIP like protocols in favor of existing link-state protocols
-same goes for PIM vs ISIS

Don't look now, but PIM moved into BGP a little while back :-).

Mark.

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/