[c-nsp] vs Netscaler loadbalancer

Gert Doering gert at greenie.muc.de
Tue Nov 5 04:20:19 EST 2013


Hi,

On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 05:57:56AM +0000, Arne Larsen  / Region Nordjylland wrote:
> We have bought to new load balancers Netscaler SDX11500 from Citrix 

In addition to what Roland said - if I remember right, this box is Xen
based, so you need to configure "physical LACP channels" on the Xen side, and
then attach virtual instances to virtual switches inside Xen (possibly with
VLAN tagging on the physical channel).

So one physical LACP channel will give you an arbitrary (well) amount of 
virtual machines.

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131105/d69f7097/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list