[c-nsp] cisco 2901 qos

[Michael Sprouffske]

I get 1 millions drops per day from the best-effort.  Is there anything that can fix this?  Do I need to adjust queue depth and if so , what would you recommend.





On Tuesday, November 5, 2013 11:20 AM, Alex Pressé <alex.presse at gmail.com> wrote:
 
You are doing it right; all traffic will be shaped to a max of 10M; with best effort getting at least 2M (or more, if there is no congestion).

class-default just matches everything that hasn't been matched already. In this case you're matching everything and then applying child policies. Within ELA_QUEUING_POLICY you might also have class-default statements - simply to match non IP traffic (depends on purpose of link).



On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Michael Sprouffske <msprouffske at yahoo.com> wrote:

class-map match-any Best-effort
> match ip precedence 0  1
>class-map match-any Priority-Three
> match ip precedence 2  3
>class-map match-any Priority-Two
> match ip precedence 4  6  7
>class-map match-any Priority-One
> match ip precedence 5
>!
>!
>policy-map ELA_QUEUING_POLICY
> class Priority-One
>    bandwidth percent 40
>     random-detect
> class Priority-Two
>    bandwidth percent 20
>     random-detect
> class Best-effort
>    bandwidth percent 20
>     random-detect
> class Priority-Three
>policy-map ELA_SHAPING_POLICY
> class class-default
>    shape average 10000000
>  service-policy ELA_QUEUING_POLICY
>
>Does this actually shape my trafffic for the class-default if i'm matching best-effort on ip pres 1 and 0?  Or does that shape command need to be in the class best-effort and say remove the class-default?
>_______________________________________________
>cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


-- 
Alex Presse
"How much net work could a network work if a network could net work?"