[c-nsp] ISP / MPLS "POP" design

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, November 07, 2013 10:53:43 AM Oliver Boehmer 
(oboehmer) wrote:

> no doubt here.. hence I really wonder who would ever put
> forward such a requirement (and Adam added a smiley, so
> not sure ;-).. We have unified-mpls to scale to very
> large MPLS domains, but the IGP certainly doesn't need
> to scale anywhere close to this..

RFC 3107, I'm assuming.

Even BGP-LS wouldn't necessarily scale, as it's exported 
data from the IGP (which won't scale to millions of routes 
anyway).

Even the data centres are turning to BGP to scale east-west 
routing away from the IGP's (draft-lapukhov-bgp-routing-
large-dc-06).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131107/adc6de33/attachment.sig>