[c-nsp] ISP / MPLS "POP" design

[Mark Tinka]

On Thursday, November 07, 2013 11:10:37 AM Oliver Boehmer 
(oboehmer) wrote:

> yep, along with multi-area/level/domain IGP..

In each island, however, multi-level/multi-area IGP's break 
MPLS-TE.

Maybe that will be solved by Segment Routing :-).

> Hmm, I consider BGP-LS only to distribute existing
> topology information to "clients" (for example some
> controllers or PCE or whatever is interested to learn
> about the network topology), not to update the RIB/FIB.

As I've slowly learned over the years in our business, one 
never knows :-).

I could see one network, for example, using BGP-LS to 
replace (not that it ever gained any notable traction) 
Inter-AS TE.

> of course, what else? ;-)

I've always said, watch this space, BGP will soon be doing 
DNS :-).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131107/3b8525d4/attachment.sig>