[c-nsp] ME3600 BFD session to A9K breaks after upgrade to 15.3(3)S1a

[Waris Sagheer (waris)]

Hi Jason,
I am working with engineering to figure out the issue. Can you please unicast me your configuration on both routers?

Best Regards,

[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]

Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)
waris at cisco.com<mailto:waris at cisco.com>
Phone: +1 408 853 6682
Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

CCIE - 19901


<http://www.cisco.com/>



This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

For corporate legal information go to:http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html



From: Jason Lixfeld <jason at lixfeld.ca<mailto:jason at lixfeld.ca>>
Date: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 11:09 AM
To: adam vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>>
Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] ME3600 BFD session to A9K breaks after upgrade to 15.3(3)S1a

No, it's not the same, but it's not the same on a working interface either.

The 15.3(3)S1a ME3600 has a CLNS MTU of 9213.
The 15.3(3)S ME3600 has a CLNS MTU of 1497.
The 4.3.1 ASR9000 has a CLNS MTU of 9199.

15.3(3)S1a ME3600 is directly connected to the 15.3(3)S ME3600 and has an ISIS adjacency and BFD session.
The 15.3(3)S1a ME3600 is directly connected to the 4.3.1 ASR9K and does not have an ISIS adjacency or BFD session.

If it was a CLNS MTU issue, I'd suspect the 15.3(3)S1a and 15.3(3)S ME3600 ISIS and BFD session would be down as well, but it's not.

That notwithstanding, the BFD session between the 9K and 15.3(3)S1a ME3600 is down as well.  ISIS CLNS issue or not, that's not going to work unless BFD works, no?

On Nov 12, 2013, at 10:20 AM, Adam Vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>> wrote:

Hi Jason,
Is the CLNS MTU equal at both ends please?
It appears this is again one of the conditions to form ISIS session in
15.3(3)S1
adam


_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/