[c-nsp] Cisco2921 vs 7206VXR/NPE-400

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, November 12, 2013 09:31:34 PM cnsp at marenda.net 
wrote:

> But that extra Gig port is shared hardware with the FAS
> Management Port, (which could be Gig...). it's another
> chipset than the other three CPU?-Ports,
> and it's not performing very well :-(

You can't expect to run any of those ports at line rate.

The entire forwarding plane in that system is good for 
700Mbps - 950Mbps, aggregate.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131115/cd5cda86/attachment.sig>