[c-nsp] MPLS-TP on CPT platform vs IP/MPLS core on ASR with TE

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, November 27, 2013 10:26:40 AM Gert Doering 
wrote:

> Yeah, that.  Want.

Last time I tested this on a CRS back in 2010, we managed 
15ms failover across a simulated 1,200km span.

That said, I tested LFA and MPLS-TE on the Juniper MX2020 a 
few months ago, and we managed some 20ms as well (although 
unlike IPoDWDM, this after failure).

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20131127/89b65ccd/attachment-0001.sig>