[c-nsp] 7600 and NAT in vrf

[Pete Lumbis]

Yes, NAT Overload in a VRF is not supported on any Sup720 based system. It
might work on Sup2t, but I'm not sure.


On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Dan Benson <dbenson at swingpad.com> wrote:

> Thanks Peter.
>
> I found that by simply removing the VRF from the interfaces I wished to do
> nat on (even though they were in the same VRF) allowed my nat to overload.
>  Is this expected behavior?
>
> All is working now.
>
> Thanks all for your help.
>
> db
>
> On Nov 26, 2013, at 6:18 PM, Pete Lumbis <alumbis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The question is will basic NAT overload work without VRFs on SX code?
> Yes, given the endless list of 6k NAT limitations.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Dan Benson <dbenson at swingpad.com>
> wrote:
> > All,
> >
> > >From reading it seems the 7600 does not support NAT in vrf (without an
> FWSM) but I thought I would ask the question. I have two interfaces in the
> same VRF (inside and outside) and I am able to static translate inbound but
> I am unable to overload with TCP and udp packets. ICMP packets traverse the
> interfaces but nothing else.   Will this work if I don’t have the VRF?
> >
> > I am running s72033-adventerprisek9-mz.151-1.SY.bin.
> >
> > Thanks in advance for your insight.
> >
> > db
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>