[c-nsp] MPLS-TE on ME3600

Waris Sagheer (waris) waris at cisco.com
Wed Oct 2 01:43:42 EDT 2013


MPLS TE support over SVI and Etherchannel is in the roadmap.

Best Regards,

[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]

Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
Service Provider Access Group
waris at cisco.com<mailto:waris at cisco.com>
Phone: +1 408 853 6682
Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

CCIE - 19901


<http://www.cisco.com/>



[Think before you print.] Think before you print.

This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html



From: Pshem Kowalczyk <pshem.k at gmail.com<mailto:pshem.k at gmail.com>>
Date: Wednesday, September 11, 2013 12:35 PM
To: Eric Van Tol <eric at atlantech.net<mailto:eric at atlantech.net>>
Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] MPLS-TE on ME3600

Hi,

We use ME3600x with MPLS TE. I can't comment on the first point (we
don't have multiple areas), but on the second one - path protection is
protection end-to-end, whilst FRR uses a local repair mechanism, so
these two are quite different in the way they work. FRR on that device
works fine and provides protection for both originated and transit
LSPs. On the third point - yes, that's a limitation. I'm not sure if
it's a hardware or a software one.

kind regards
Pshem


On 12 September 2013 04:15, Eric Van Tol <eric at atlantech.net<mailto:eric at atlantech.net>> wrote:
Hi all,
I'm a bit confused about the documentation for the ME3600 with regard to its MPLS-TE support.  Specifically, the 'MPLS TE' section (http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/metro/me3600x_3800x/software/release/15.3_3_S/configuration/guide/swmpls.html#wp1183331) states:

The switch does not support these MPLS TE features:
*Interarea TE support for OSPF and IS-IS
*TE path protection

On the first bulletpoint, does this simply mean that it cannot pass through areas without an explicit path set up?

On the second bulletpoint, I'm confused about this because the next section in the documentation deals with Fast Reroute.  Does this bulletpoint mean that the ME3600 cannot provide protection for transit LSPs?

And finally, within the Fast Reroute section, I see this little nugget:

"The switch supports MPLS TE fast reroute over only routed ports and not over SVIs or EtherChannels."

Huh?  Really?

-evt

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list