[c-nsp] Cisco Switch Portfolio Miss

[Aled Morris]

Well, when I said I thought the switches were equal, I wasn't referring to
the price!

Cisco, always "reassuringly expensive" :-)

Aled


On 12 September 2013 17:57, Mark Mason <MMason at jackhenry.com> wrote:

>  Yea, the Nexus 6k lineup is quite a bit more expensive than the 3k
> lineup. The pricing and builds for the 3k’s aren’t too bad. Great input
> guys!****
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* aled.w.morris at googlemail.com [mailto:aled.w.morris at googlemail.com]
> *On Behalf Of *Aled Morris
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:49 AM
> *To:* Mark Mason
> *Cc:* Oliver Garraux; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>
> *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Portfolio Miss****
>
> ** **
>
> I don't have hands-on experience with them but I assumed that Cisco 6001T
> = Arista 7050T and Cisco 6001P = Arista 7050S****
>
> ** **
>
> Aled****
>
> ** **
>
> On 12 September 2013 17:46, Mark Mason <MMason at jackhenry.com> wrote:****
>
> Yea, actually just seeing that now! Might have a winner!****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> *From:* Oliver Garraux [mailto:oliver at g.garraux.net]
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 12, 2013 11:46 AM
> *To:* Aled Morris
> *Cc:* Mark Mason; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net****
>
>
> *Subject:* Re: [c-nsp] Cisco Switch Portfolio Miss****
>
>  ****
>
> How is the Arista 7050 different than the Nexus 3064?  Cisco recently
> slashed the pricing on several of the 3064 models by quite a bit.  I'm not
> intimately familiar with Arista pricing, but the 3064's current list price
> isn't widely different than what I see for the Arista 7050 on a few sites.
> ****
>
>  ****
>
> Oliver****
>
>
> ****
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> Oliver Garraux
> Check out my blog:  blog.garraux.net
> Follow me on Twitter:  twitter.com/olivergarraux****
>
>  ****
>
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:30 PM, Aled Morris <aledm at qix.co.uk> wrote:****
>
> If you are brand-loyal to Cisco you might want to look at the Nexus 3000 or
> Nexus 6000 ranges.
>
> Aled****
>
>
>
>
> On 12 September 2013 15:56, Mark Mason <MMason at jackhenry.com> wrote:
>
> > The Cisco product line seems to be missing an equivalent of the Arista
> > 7050 100Mb/1Gb/10GBase-T. Maybe taking the 4500x platform converting the
> 32
> > SFP ports to copper, and then expansion slot 4x40Gb ports then drop the
> > price 10k+ we might have a match. Thoughts NSP community?
> > NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it
> are
> > intended
> > exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The
> > message,
> > together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
> > information.
> > Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or
> > distribution
> > is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
> please
> > immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/****
>
>  ****
>
> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are
> intended
> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The
> message,
> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or
> distribution
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.****
>
> ** **
>
> NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are
> intended
> exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The
> message,
> together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged
> information.
> Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or
> distribution
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
> immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.
>