[c-nsp] new Cisco's NCS> ISP flagship router

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, September 24, 2013 08:54:44 PM Lukasz Bromirski 
wrote:

> Indeed. But NCS 6k won’t be typical router for everyone -
> depending on scale, feature requirements and of course
> interface choice and price. CRS-3 and CRS-X are here
> also :)

Agree.

The majority of ISP's will still find the CRS and CRS-X more 
than sufficient, especially if they're still going to dabble 
with non-Ethernet ports (SONET/SDH, mostly), and Gig-E.

Juniper's MX480/960 will be other options still at play, in 
a world where we're now seeing the NCS and PTX.

The NCS and PTX have their place in the eco system, but it 
won't be for everyone. Not in the medium term anyway.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20130924/c3e0bb63/attachment.sig>