[c-nsp] Peering between route reflectors

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Mon Apr 7 16:05:29 EDT 2014


On Monday, April 07, 2014 10:03:24 PM Cydon Satyr wrote:

> When I asked the question I was following an idea where
> ALL PE routers peer with EACH RR. Because in any other
> case, my question wouldn't make sense.
> 
> So with this in mind, if all PE routers peer with ALL RR,
> why should RRs peer between themselves, IF none of RRs
> are in forwarding path?

In this case, it won't matter much because each PE router 
has a session to ALL route reflectors.

How practical this is depending on the scope of your network 
is an entirely different matter.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140407/0682313c/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list