[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 137, Issue 10

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Apr 8 15:28:20 EDT 2014


On Tuesday, April 08, 2014 09:11:45 PM Andrew Clark wrote:

> But it highlights the fact
> that it's very very hard to predict all the ways in
> which a network can break.

I have to agree with that.

If it won't cost you anything administratively, just peer 
the RR's and test scenarios where you think it's not useful 
to. De-peering them shouldn't be an issue if it makes sense.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140408/334996b2/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list