[c-nsp] OSPFv3 Multiple Address Families Support in IOS

[Christopher Werny]

Hi,

thanks to both of you for the feedback. As we are a "typical" enterprise environment, TE isn't much of a concern for us. 

Best
Christopher

-----Original Message-----
From: sthaug at nethelp.no [mailto:sthaug at nethelp.no] 
Sent: Dienstag, 5. August 2014 20:25
To: darrenoc at outlook.com
Cc: Christopher Werny; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 Multiple Address Families Support in IOS

> No TE extensions for OSPFv3 is the biggest issue.

>>And for those who aren't married to OSPF, IS-IS is still an excellent
>>alternative.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no

> 
> Thanks
> Darren
> http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
> 
> 
> 
> > From: cwerny at ernw.de
> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2014 17:48:22 +0000
> > Subject: [c-nsp] OSPFv3 Multiple Address Families Support in IOS
> > 
> > Dear list,
> > 
> > I noticed that support for multiple address families in OSPFv3 was added in recent IOS versions.  I am currently thinking about updating the IOS version on my routers and subsequently consolidating OSPFv2 and OSPFv3 into OSPFv3 for both IPv4 and IPv6.
> > 
> > Has anyone done this before and can share some experience with it? What are (in your opinion) the pros and cons of the aforementioned consolidation of OSPFv2/v3 into only OSPFv3?
> > 
> > Thanks in advance for your time and feedback.
> > 
> > Best,
> > Christopher
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>  		 	   		  
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>