[c-nsp] LNS question asr 1002

[Edwardo Garcia]

Thanks Arie will research this.

BTW, any ideas  on the first question? :-) that is, realistic numbers
of active broadband users on a 1002 with a 24K license?

On 8/19/14, Arie Vayner (avayner) <avayner at cisco.com> wrote:
> You may actually want to look at summarizing this. The best practice would
> be to have a per-LNS pool (either locally managed or from RADIUS) and
> advertise the summary from the LNS up to the network.
> You may need to redistribute also connected routes for "fixed IP" services
> where a user may have a custom IP from the RADIUS.
>
> Not summarizing means that every connection (and disconnection) is a BGP
> update driving your CPU utilization across the BGP domain...
>
>
> Arie
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Mike
> Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 09:23
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] LNS question asr 1002
>
>
> On 08/17/2014 08:24 PM, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>> Secondly, how does one handle running two LNS servers? How does the
>> border router know which edge (LNS) to forward too for a particular
>> IP?
>
>      I do it with iBGP where my router is advertising individual /32's.
> Yes it makes the route tables longer but it works well in my environment.
> YMMV.
>
> Mike-
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>