[c-nsp] LNS question asr 1002

[Edwardo Garcia]

Thanks, might be beter way to go.

On 8/19/14, Nitzan Tzelniker <nitzan.tzelniker at gmail.com> wrote:
> Do you talk about ASR-1002x or ASR1002 ?
> Take a look on this page (Cisco didn't update it with new models for a long
> time )
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/routers/asr1000/configuration/guide/chassis/asrswcfg/scaling.html
>
> The 1002 is limited to 12K
> We didnt test the 1002-x but on a 1004 with ESP-20 and RP2 we cross the 32K
> L2TP sessions without a problem (48K and even 64K for short time )  but it
> is not recommended to cross the limits
>
> Nitzan
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Edwardo Garcia <wdgarc88 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Thanks Arie will research this.
>>
>> BTW, any ideas  on the first question? :-) that is, realistic numbers
>> of active broadband users on a 1002 with a 24K license?
>>
>> On 8/19/14, Arie Vayner (avayner) <avayner at cisco.com> wrote:
>> > You may actually want to look at summarizing this. The best practice
>> would
>> > be to have a per-LNS pool (either locally managed or from RADIUS) and
>> > advertise the summary from the LNS up to the network.
>> > You may need to redistribute also connected routes for "fixed IP"
>> services
>> > where a user may have a custom IP from the RADIUS.
>> >
>> > Not summarizing means that every connection (and disconnection) is a
>> > BGP
>> > update driving your CPU utilization across the BGP domain...
>> >
>> >
>> > Arie
>> >
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
>> > Mike
>> > Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 09:23
>> > To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > Subject: Re: [c-nsp] LNS question asr 1002
>> >
>> >
>> > On 08/17/2014 08:24 PM, Edwardo Garcia wrote:
>> >> Secondly, how does one handle running two LNS servers? How does the
>> >> border router know which edge (LNS) to forward too for a particular
>> >> IP?
>> >
>> >      I do it with iBGP where my router is advertising individual /32's.
>> > Yes it makes the route tables longer but it works well in my
>> > environment.
>> > YMMV.
>> >
>> > Mike-
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>>
>