[c-nsp] ASR9k 4.3.4 vs 5.1.3

[Nick Hilliard]

On 21/08/2014 16:48, Vitkovský Adam wrote:
> I'm wondering what influenced your decision to go/risk it with 5.1.x rather than 4.3.4 ?

the boxes were shipped with it.  There were a bunch of PWHE enhancements 
that looked interesting at the time although we didn't end up using them in 
the end.  We did consider downgrading to 4.3.4 before deployment but ended 
up not doing it because we didn't run into trouble in pre- production.  As 
it turns out, we aren't using the features which seem to have caused 
trouble for other people.

I have a couple more boxes on 4.3.4 and have no plans to upgrade for some 
while.  They're stable and don't cause trouble.

Nick