[c-nsp] RPR in MetroE

[Waris Sagheer (waris)]

G8032 will be another option for L2 with 3.3 msec CCM timers.

Best Regards,

[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]

Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)
waris at cisco.com<mailto:waris at cisco.com>
Phone: +1 408 853 6682
Mobile: +1 408 835 1389

CCIE - 19901


<http://www.cisco.com/>



This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.

For corporate legal information go to:http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html



From: adam vitkovsky <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>>
Date: Monday, August 4, 2014 at 2:32 AM
To: thiyagarajan b <bn.thiyagarajan at gmail.com<mailto:bn.thiyagarajan at gmail.com>>
Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] RPR in MetroE

Oh my bad, sorry about the confusion, as Saku mentioned already REP is what you should be looking for to build L2 rings.
RPR/SPR is for the optical domain.

adam

From: thiyagarajan b [mailto:bn.thiyagarajan at gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2014 10:05 AM
To: Vitkovský Adam
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] RPR in MetroE

Thanks Adam for your suggestion, It takes lot of setup change for implementing MPLS in ME so I would rather go for RPR for now. But I am finding only Cisco 10700 series supports RPR when I refer to the cisco feature navigator.

Warm Regards,
Thiyagarajan B.

On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Vitkovský Adam <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk><mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>> wrote:
Hi,
Sure 802.17 RPR is meant to supersede the STP for loop avoidance, faster convergence and better BW efficiency.
However in order to deploy it all nodes in the ring have to support it.
All ME series switches should support it.
Though I'd recommend upgrading the kit to MPLS capable ME switches and to use rLFA to achieve sub 50ms convergence.


adam
-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net>] On Behalf Of
thiyagarajan b
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2014 3:07 PM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net><mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [c-nsp] RPR in MetroE

Hi,

Can Resilient Packet Ring can be used in Metro Ethernet (L2) for loop
avoidance instead of MSTP?

Warm Regards,
Thiyagarajan B.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net><mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/