[c-nsp] RAM thing

[Saku Ytti]

On (2014-02-17 12:24 +0000), Phil Mayers wrote:

> So nothing has changed except we know about it. For anyone who
> assumed devices could fail at any time, this isn't *that* worrying.
> For anyone who assumed devices would run forever, this should be a
> wake-up call - it was never true, and will likely never be so ;o)

Should we expect devices to be build so that broken memory is detected and
reported to operator? Or is it OK that broken memory is undetected and mangles
packets without us being aware?

-- 
  ++ytti