[c-nsp] SPA Module compatibility

Mark Tinka mark.tinka at seacom.mu
Tue Feb 25 22:55:47 EST 2014


On Tuesday, February 25, 2014 11:36:21 AM Gert Doering 
wrote:

> Well.  My problem is, I can't always forklift to the
> "latest and greatest" in routing equipment - while our
> 7200s will shape just fine, they won't go much faster
> than maybe 50 mbit/s with shaping.  OTOH our 6500s will
> handle any bandwidth you throw at them, but will just
> not shape, period.
> 
> ... and when I have to decide whether to get a 200
> Mbit/s-on-GE line plus an ASR1k or ME3xxx to do shaping,
> or maybe get 2x100 Mbit/s line rate (or full GE) and
> plug into the already-there-6500...  the decision isn't
> always easy.

Fair point.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140226/7dee54ef/attachment.sig>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list