[c-nsp] Upgrading to 40G

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 28, 2014 at 12:49:26PM +0200, Mark Tinka wrote:
> While I can appreciate this, history has always proven that 
> users will find a use for something for which it wasn't 
> initially intended - y'know, like using a Cisco 2901 as a 
> core router :-).

<old age day>
2503 made a good core router, back in the day...  (we had two! A 2503 
and a 4500, with a E1 between them...)

This newfangled 2900 stuff, nobody needs that much RAM in a router!
</old age day>

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140228/218975f5/attachment.sig>