[c-nsp] Quick question on HSRP...

Blake Dunlap ikiris at gmail.com
Thu Jan 2 12:55:32 EST 2014


There wouldn't be a connected route if it's just L2 communication as the
other side wouldn't have an L3 address unless it was active.


On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Phil Mayers <p.mayers at imperial.ac.uk>wrote:

> On 02/01/14 17:48, Blake Dunlap wrote:
>
>> I'm still waiting for the day that HSRP can use pure L2 addresses to
>> communicate and not burn 3 ips...
>>
>
> Yeah, that's not ideal. But why not wish for an option to remove the
> "connected" route on the standby while you're at it ;o)
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list