[c-nsp] Quick question on HSRP...

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Thu, Jan 02, 2014 at 11:48:53AM -0600, Blake Dunlap wrote:
> I'm still waiting for the day that HSRP can use pure L2 addresses to
> communicate and not burn 3 ips...

Yeah.  Or deactivate the standy interface, ip-routing wise, so you can
ensure symmetric traffic (which helps ensure that all switches in the
path see forward and reverse traffic, thus avoiding flooding).

But yeah, christmas is over :-)

gert
-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140102/45bad896/attachment.sig>