[c-nsp] DHCPv6

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Sun, Jan 05, 2014 at 10:44:32AM -0500, Justin M. Streiner wrote:
> My personal opinion is that this feature should have been part of DHCPv6 
> from the very beginning - for the sake of feature parity between DHCPv4 
> and DHCPv6 - but I was not a part of those discussions.

It would be good for the signal-to-noise ratio to *not* have this
discussion on every single mailing list in the world.  Again.

*Please* keep "is DHCPv6 or RA the loonie camp?" *off* cisco-nsp.

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 305 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140105/8cbc84fc/attachment.sig>