[c-nsp] Redundancy options for Dual Home Devices using EoMPLS or VPLS

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 10:51:20 PM 
daniel.dib at reaper.nu wrote:

> I agree. That was my initial choice but had to abandon it
> due to pricing. It would simplify the network a lot to
> have proper L3 in the access device itself. I don't like
> things that require to sync state and I'm not sure how
> it would handle a split brain scenario if the link
> between the two PEs go down.

Search the archives for this, we got into a lot of detail 
some time last year on similar deployment scenarios.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140115/a6c89b54/attachment-0001.sig>