[c-nsp] Sharing a shaping policy?

Cydon Satyr cydonsatyr at gmail.com
Fri Jul 4 10:02:10 EDT 2014


Hello,

Any chance you could post a small picture of your topology?

Regards


On Fri, Jul 4, 2014 at 11:29 AM, James Bensley <jwbensley at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 4 July 2014 01:14, CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_list at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > The carriers AGG port has multiple other customers(vlans),
> > and is only a 3560 (So minimal QOS capabilities)....Would something like
> an
> > ME3600 provide additional flexibility to shape at the vlan level egress?
>  i.e. Carrier AGG moved to an ME3600, shaping
> > policy that matches the two vlans, but I need the 2 vlans to "share"
> > the 50M shaping policy?
>
> I'm a bit confused on the topology at your PE device;
>
> Do you only have one port facing the tail provider NNI and the two
> tail circuits have different VLANs on them such as the link to site 1
> has VLAN 10 and 20 and the link to site 2 has VLAN 30 an 40?
>
> Or do these tails come in to two differnt interfaces?
>
> Or (hopefully not) do they both come into the same interface and have
> the same VLANs?
>
> Depending on which of the above you have you can acheive this with an
> ME3600/3800 using EVCs.
>
> Cheers,
> James.
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list