[c-nsp] Configure 802.1Q on HWIC-4SHDSL-E

[Gert Doering]

Hi,

On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:05:22AM +0300, Tarko Tikan wrote:
> >As a background: there's carriers that require you to tag the traffic
> >on the carrier side.  Stupid idea?  dunno.  Breaking all sort of CPEs?
> >betcha!
> 
> He requested config for EFM (bonding). EFM and VDSL2 both have ethernet 
> encapsulation and use vlan tags instead ATM PVCs.
> 
> Stupid? Don't think so.

Why require a vlan tag if there's only a single service on it?

gert

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 291 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140708/e267dada/attachment.sig>