[c-nsp] why there are no plans for A903-RSP2B-240 please?????
Vitkovský Adam
adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk
Tue Jul 22 09:17:34 EDT 2014
MX240 is too big however MX104 is exactly what I was talking about.
adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: sthaug at nethelp.no [mailto:sthaug at nethelp.no]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 2:38 PM
> To: Vitkovský Adam
> Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] why there are no plans for A903-RSP2B-240 please?????
>
> > Really to get over 20K prefixes in HW with Metro-E+MPLS features we all
> are willing to install huge 10RU boxes almost as thick as high all around the
> place?
> > That just doesn't sound right.
> > Or does it?
>
> Juniper MX240, 5U. But definitely more expensive than metro/switch class
> equipment.
>
> I think Cisco, Juniper and others are afraid of destroying the nice profit
> margins on their higher end boxes. But maybe that's just me...
>
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list