[c-nsp] why there are no plans for A903-RSP2B-240 please?????

[Vitkovský Adam]

This C6880-X is a very interesting box, very powerful indeed.
The only drawback is that it doesn’t have redundant RSP/Sup however it can be stacked together.

Would have to read through the documentation to find out about the MPLS features’ availability.
Though the data-sheet claims full MPLS/VPLS functionality.
Since it is Sup-2T based it should have the same features as 7600 right?


adam

From: Tim Durack [mailto:tdurack at gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:54 PM
To: Vitkovský Adam
Cc: sthaug at nethelp.no; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] why there are no plans for A903-RSP2B-240 please?????

May not have all of the SP features you need, but the C6880-X is an interesting semi-fixed platform.

On Tue, Jul 22, 2014 at 9:41 AM, Vitkovský Adam <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk<mailto:adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>> wrote:
> From: sthaug at nethelp.no<mailto:sthaug at nethelp.no> [mailto:sthaug at nethelp.no<mailto:sthaug at nethelp.no>]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:21 PM
>
> > MX240 is too big however MX104 is exactly what I was talking about.
>
> MX104 is a very nice box, as long as you can live with its limited CPU
> horsepower. We'll be installing several of them soon.
>
> Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug at nethelp.no<mailto:sthaug at nethelp.no>
Well I'm pretty annoyed by the asr903 limited CPU horsepower.
Reloading the box takes ages also saving config introduces a very 90's style delay.

Does MX104 support LFA or rLFA please?

adam

_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



--
Tim:>