[c-nsp] 512K routes approaching - have you adjusted your tcam settings

["Rolf Hanßen"]

Hi Mack,

I am wondering about "including sup 2T"?
As far as I see Sup2T has no static CAM partition anymore and therefore
needs no specific maximums set.

kind regards
Rolf

> As many readers on this list know the routing table is approaching 512K
> routes.
> For some it has already passed this threshold.
> For those that aren't familiar with the issues associated with passing
> this threshold,
> I suggest the following two documents:
>
> http://www.ipv4depletion.com/?p=672
>
> http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/catalyst-6500-series-switches/117712-problemsolution-cat6500-00.html
>
> Effected devices include 6500s (including sup 2T), 7600s, nexus 7Ks and
> many devices by other vendors.
> This problem will likely impact us in some way over the next month even if
> we fixed our devices because
> We connect to other services that have not prepared.
>
> So be on the lookout for MLSCEF-SP-7-FIB_EXCEPTION messages in your logs.
>
> Mack McBride | Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>