[c-nsp] BGP vs OSPF (CE -> PE)

[Mark Tinka]

On Wednesday, June 18, 2014 07:30:25 AM Oliver Boehmer 
(oboehmer) wrote:

> OSPF sham links have been introduced to help in this
> situation, but BGP is certainly easier as it doesn't
> need those and you can manipulate the policy using
> normal BGP attributes..

Agree.

Static or BGP routing only as a PE-CE routing protocol, on 
our side.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20140618/9e4ef432/attachment-0001.sig>