[c-nsp] cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 139, Issue 21
Richard Gilliam
rdg765611 at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 18 12:31:01 EDT 2014
LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics for layer 2 and 3 are auto config'd and auto Added according to brocade.
--------------------------------------------
On Wed, 6/18/14, cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net <cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:
Subject: cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 139, Issue 21
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Date: Wednesday, June 18, 2014, 9:03 AM
Send cisco-nsp mailing list
submissions to
cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help'
to
cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
cisco-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more
specific
than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Brocade/Foundry Gbic (Harry Hambi -
Atos)
2. Re: Brocade/Foundry Gbic (Darren
O'Connor)
3. Re: BGP vs OSPF (CE -> PE)
(Vitkovsk? Adam)
4. Re: Brocade/Foundry Gbic (Nick
Hilliard)
5. Re: Brocade/Foundry Gbic (Clement
Cavadore)
6. Which IOS version for 1841 router can
use PPPOE on
sub-interface? (PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE
IX)
7. 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical
Cable (Gilles Fabre)
8. Re: 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout
Optical Cable (Andrew Miehs)
9. Re: 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout
Optical Cable (Azher Mughal)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:34:09 +0000
From: Harry Hambi - Atos <harry.hambi at bbc.co.uk>
To: "'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net'"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic
Message-ID:
<F05D03E557A94948A0C4A6B2311EAA12573E7518 at BGB01XUD1014.national.core.bbc.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi All,
I have some LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics . I'me
told there is a command that will enable these Gbics to work
in a Cisco chassis, is this this the case ?,
If so does anyone know the commands?. Thanks in advance
Rgds
Harry
Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb
------------------------------
Message: 2
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:46:05 +0100
From: "Darren O'Connor" <darrenoc at outlook.com>
To: Harry Hambi - Atos <harry.hambi at bbc.co.uk>,
"'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net'"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic
Message-ID: <DUB126-W9080F526A293E5F4B91E07DE100 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
service unsupported-transceiver
Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie
> From: harry.hambi at bbc.co.uk
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:34:09 +0000
> Subject: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic
>
> Hi All,
> I have some LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics .
I'me told there is a command that will enable these Gbics to
work in a Cisco chassis, is this this the case ?,
> If so does anyone know the commands?. Thanks in
advance
>
>
>
> Rgds
> Harry
>
> Harry Hambi BEng(Hons) MIET Rsgb
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
------------------------------
Message: 3
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 08:48:28 +0000
From: Vitkovsk? Adam <adam.vitkovsky at swan.sk>
To: CiscoNSP List <cisconsp_list at hotmail.com>,
"cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] BGP vs OSPF (CE -> PE)
Message-ID: <61DC6BC4ABA10E4489D4A73EBABAC18B019C62DA at EX01.swan.local>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
It's because intra-area LSAs are preferred compared to
inter-area LSAs.
The super-backbone(MP-BGP->OSPF) introduces LSAs from the
remote site as Type-3 into the LSDB of a local PE and if the
local PE happens to have a Type-1 LSA from a directly
connected link than that one is preferred. So you can either
make both LSAs to appear as Type-1 using sham-link or you
can make both to be type-3 using different areas on each
site.
Or you can use BGP as everyone else and can forget about all
this mess above.
adam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net]
On Behalf Of
> CiscoNSP List
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 7:12 AM
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] BGP vs OSPF (CE -> PE)
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We typically use OSPF (CE/PE) so customer can advertise
routes into their
> VRF - We have issues with failover (When customer site
has 2 links) but the
> links go to different PE"s of ours (We only have agg's
from carriers on certain
> PE's)..
>
> eg.
>
> Customer(vrf) has a site(foo) connected to PE A + B (PE
B is "failover" link)
>
> Same customer has another site(bar) connected to PE B.
>
> Traffic from site "bar" to "foo" will go via PE B,
which is not what we
> want...we have manipulated this to work via longer
subnets (i.e. failover link
> advertising a /23 instead of a /24), but this isnt
always feasible.
>
> Would BGP(Instead of OSFP) help in this
situation...i.e. Can we manipulate
> how the routes are advertised(PE A/B) within the vrf
more easily if the CE
> advertises via BGP vs OSPF? Or any other suggestions?
>
> Cheers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
------------------------------
Message: 4
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 09:50:37 +0100
From: Nick Hilliard <nick at foobar.org>
To: Harry Hambi - Atos <harry.hambi at bbc.co.uk>,
"'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net'"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic
Message-ID: <53A152DD.7090004 at foobar.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
On 18/06/2014 09:34, Harry Hambi - Atos wrote:
> I have some LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics .
I'me told there is a
> command that will enable these Gbics to work in a Cisco
chassis, is this
> this the case ?, If so does anyone know the commands?.
Thanks in
> advance
ios:
service unsupported-transceiver
no errdisable detect cause gbic-invalid
xr:
service unsupported-transceiver
interface x/y/z
transceiver permit pid all
Nick
------------------------------
Message: 5
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 10:43:45 +0200
From: Clement Cavadore <clement at cavadore.net>
To: Harry Hambi - Atos <harry.hambi at bbc.co.uk>
Cc: "'cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net'"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Brocade/Foundry Gbic
Message-ID: <1403081025.850.108.camel at puisard>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-15"
Hi,
On Wed, 2014-06-18 at 08:34 +0000, Harry Hambi - Atos
wrote:
> I have some LX & SX brocade/foundry Gbics .
I'me told there is a command that will enable these Gbics to
work in a Cisco chassis, is this this the case ?,
> If so does anyone know the commands?. Thanks in
advance
service unsupported-transceiver ?
--
Cl?ment Cavadore
------------------------------
Message: 6
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:31:00 +0700
From: PlaWanSai RMUTT CPE IX <pws_admin at thaicpe.com>
To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: [c-nsp] Which IOS version for 1841 router can use
PPPOE on
sub-interface?
Message-ID: <BLU436-SMTP145A0D945A0260D01F9BFCC93100 at phx.gbl>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Which IOS version for 1841 router can use PPPOE on
sub-interface?
Thank you very much.
------------------------------
Message: 7
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 13:37:43 +0200 (CEST)
From: Gilles Fabre <fabre.gilles at voila.fr>
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical
Cable
Message-ID: <2003883958.54861403091463742.JavaMail.www at wwinf7114>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Hi all
?I have been searching for 40G to 4*10G cables (not
DAC/Twinax but optical ones).
?Did you ever use such cables ? is it reliable ?
?I did not find any monomode ones, I guess this is not
existing... any idea why (strength of signal ?) ?
Thanks & best regards
Gilles
?
___________________________________________________________
Mode, hifi, maison,? J'ach?te malin. Je compare les prix
avec Voila.fr http://shopping.voila.fr/
------------------------------
Message: 8
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:41:15 +1000
From: Andrew Miehs <andrew at 2sheds.de>
To: Gilles Fabre <fabre.gilles at voila.fr>
Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical
Cable
Message-ID:
<CAKf7gMCAbdUhVXMjGqVHJABbMvqGqr2WHHLh=szu9A18u=fAqw at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Was looking at this a while ago - but haven't had a chance
to try any of it
- no one has bought me any 40G kit yet...
>From Cisco - for Multimode - Cisco QSFP-40G-SR4 - This
terminates on a
MPO-12 plug which you can connect to 4x 10G SR
Unfortunately Cisco doesn't make a single mode version - but
I found -
these from Arista - don't know if they work though -
QSFP-40G-PLR4
and QSFP-40G-PLRL4
Good luck, and if you do get to try it out - please keep us
informed.
Regards
Andrew
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Gilles Fabre <fabre.gilles at voila.fr>
wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I have been searching for 40G to 4*10G cables
(not DAC/Twinax but optical
> ones).
> Did you ever use such cables ? is it reliable ?
> I did not find any monomode ones, I guess this is
not existing... any
> idea why (strength of signal ?) ?
>
> Thanks & best regards
> Gilles
>
>
>
___________________________________________________________
> Mode, hifi, maison,? J'ach?te malin. Je compare les
prix avec Voila.fr
> http://shopping.voila.fr/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
------------------------------
Message: 9
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 06:15:28 -0700
From: Azher Mughal <azher at hep.caltech.edu>
To: Andrew Miehs <andrew at 2sheds.de>,
Gilles Fabre
<fabre.gilles at voila.fr>
Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net"
<cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] 40G QSFP to 4*10G SFP+ Breakout Optical
Cable
Message-ID: <53A190F0.8030809 at hep.caltech.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
I don't have Cisco switches with QSFP ports, but have used
both SR and
LR versions of these breakout cables from Elpeus.com without
problems in
Dell / Force10.
Cheers
-Azher
On 6/18/2014 5:41 AM, Andrew Miehs wrote:
> Was looking at this a while ago - but haven't had a
chance to try any of it
> - no one has bought me any 40G kit yet...
>
> From Cisco - for Multimode - Cisco QSFP-40G-SR4 - This
terminates on a
> MPO-12 plug which you can connect to 4x 10G SR
>
> Unfortunately Cisco doesn't make a single mode version
- but I found -
> these from Arista - don't know if they work though -
QSFP-40G-PLR4
> and QSFP-40G-PLRL4
>
> Good luck, and if you do get to try it out - please
keep us informed.
>
> Regards
>
> Andrew
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Gilles Fabre <fabre.gilles at voila.fr>
wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> I have been searching for 40G to 4*10G cables
(not DAC/Twinax but optical
>> ones).
>> Did you ever use such cables ? is it reliable
?
>> I did not find any monomode ones, I guess
this is not existing... any
>> idea why (strength of signal ?) ?
>>
>> Thanks & best regards
>> Gilles
>>
>>
>>
___________________________________________________________
>> Mode, hifi, maison,? J'ach?te malin. Je compare les
prix avec Voila.fr
>> http://shopping.voila.fr/
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list
cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
------------------------------
End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 139, Issue 21
******************************************
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list