[c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Replacing 3750X stack

Gustav UHLANDER gustav.ulander at steria.se
Fri May 2 06:50:33 EDT 2014


Maybee the new 3650 is enough? 
Should have dubbel the buffer size according to cisco (12mb vs 6mb) Shared on all ports. 
Question is if its enough?

Bästa hälsningar / Best regards,

Gustav Uhlander
Senior Communication & Infrastructure Engineer

Steria AB
Kungsbron 13
Box 169
SE-101 23  Stockholm
Sweden

Tel: +46 8 622 42 15
Fax: +46 8 622 42 23
Mobile: +46 70 962 71 03
gustav.ulander at steria.se 
www.steria.se

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Gert Doering
Sent: den 2 maj 2014 09:55
To: Garry
Cc: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: Re: [c-nsp] *** GMX Spamverdacht *** Replacing 3750X stack

Hi,

On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 06:43:32AM +0200, Garry wrote:
> > We have a 3750X stack (2 switches) doing pure L2 at a small POP (Acting as a "core" switch) - The small buffers are causing a lot of performance issues, so we are looking to upgrade them.
> >
> Not sure about your feature requirements, but have you thought about a 
> Nexus 5500/2200 combo? Alternatively, the 2960X series provides pretty

If buffers are an issue, 2960 is no better than 3750.

gert
--
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert at greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert at net.informatik.tu-muenchen.de



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list