[c-nsp] CsC IOS XR

[M K]

Thanks a lot man , I forgot about it !
It worked well

BR,

From: darrenoc at outlook.com
To: gunner_200 at live.com; cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: RE: [c-nsp] CsC IOS XR
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 16:03:02 +0100




What does your MPLS config look like? You need /32 static routes on XR for labelled next-hops in certain cases as it's not automatic. 

In your topology, what is the customer PE and provider PEs? Does the XR box have a valid labelled next-hop to the correct PE?

Thanks
Darren
http://www.mellowd.co.uk/ccie



> From: gunner_200 at live.com
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 16:53:04 +0300
> Subject: [c-nsp] CsC IOS XR
> 
> Hi all
> I am simulating CsC using Cisco IOS XR (on GNS3)
> The topology looks like below 
> R5 -- R1 -- XR1 -- R2 -- R3 -- R4 -- R6
> I am using BGP as the PE-CE routing protocol in order to achieve connectivity between R1 lo0 and R4 lo0 and it's done
> Now , I have configured OSPF as the routing protocol between R5 - R1 and R6 - R4 and I did all the redistribution
> RP/0/0/CPU0:XR1#sh run router bgp
> Mon May  5 14:48:47.261 UTC
> router bgp 1
>  address-family ipv4 unicast
>  !
>  address-family vpnv4 unicast
>  !
>  neighbor 3.3.3.3
>   remote-as 1
>   update-source Loopback0
>   address-family vpnv4 unicast
>   !
>  !
>  vrf MSSK
>   rd 100:1
>   address-family ipv4 unicast
>    allocate-label all
>   !
>   neighbor 192.168.102.1
>    remote-as 14
>    address-family ipv4 unicast
>     route-policy PASS_CE in
>     route-policy PASS_CE out
>     as-override
> 
> What am facing now is I even lost connectivity between R1 lo0 and R4 lo0 networks
> Am i missing something ?
> 
> Thanks
>  		 	   		  
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/