[c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!
Waris Sagheer (waris)
waris at cisco.com
Sun May 18 03:28:33 EDT 2014
Hi James,
Is the issue resolved? I am copying my team to help with the following issue.
Hi Wade and Ramji,
Can you please look into this issue?
Best Regards,
[http://www.cisco.com/web/europe/images/email/signature/horizontal06.jpg]
Waris Sagheer
Technical Marketing Manager
Service Provider Access Group (SPAG)
waris at cisco.com<mailto:waris at cisco.com>
Phone: +1 408 853 6682
Mobile: +1 408 835 1389
CCIE - 19901
<http://www.cisco.com/>
This email may contain confidential and privileged material for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any review, use, distribution or disclosure by others is strictly prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient (or authorized to receive for the recipient), please contact the sender by reply email and delete all copies of this message.
For corporate legal information go to:http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html
From: James Bensley <jwbensley at gmail.com<mailto:jwbensley at gmail.com>>
Date: Monday, May 12, 2014 at 6:10 AM
To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>>
Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco ME3x00 Egress Policie - Denied by Cisco/IOS!
Hi All,
Has anyone encountered this issue on the ME3600/ME3800s;
Cisco 2960 - Layer 2 device terminating Layer 2 connections
|
| Layer 2 Trunk on 100Mbps port
|
Cisco ME3800 - Various layer 2 connections trunked up in VLANs for
termination on ME3800
We are trying to apply some policers on the ME3800 for multiple 10Mbps
circuits being delivered on the 2960 because some of them are on
faster bearers. The problem is that when you try to apply a policy on
the ME3x00 series and you add in an 11th policer for 10Mbps it throws
up an error saying the port is oversubscribed and the config isn't
allowed. You can't police 11+ VLANs for example to 10Mbps on a 100Mbps
port.
These devices are meant to go near/on the access layer where
oversubscription lives :)
Has anyone encountered this and has anyone overcome it?
We have a TAC case open, they are almost definately going to say
"that's what is supposed to happen".
Cheers,
James.
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net<mailto:cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list