[c-nsp] ME3600X-ME3800X: L2VPN new syntax cannot set MTU on PW

Jason Lixfeld jason at lixfeld.ca
Fri May 23 09:18:34 EDT 2014


What version?

Sent from my iPhone

> On May 23, 2014, at 9:07 AM, Pasquino Andrea <andrea.pasquino at eng.it> wrote:
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I have working VCs (port based) with this syntax:
> 
> interface GigabitEthernet0/11
> switchport trunk allowed vlan none
> switchport mode trunk
> mtu xxxx
> service instance 1 ethernet
>  encapsulation untagged , dot1q 1-4094
> !
> l2vpn xconnect context xxxxx
> member GigabitEthernet0/11 service-instance 1 
> member x.x.x.x 10001 encapsulation mpls
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> However I'm not able to set MTU for vlan based VCs with the same syntax:
> 
> interface TenGigabitEthernet0/2
> !
> [many other service instances]
> !
> service instance 930 ethernet
>  encapsulation dot1q 930
>  rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
> !
> l2vpn xconnect context 10003
> member TenGigabitEthernet0/2 service-instance 930 
> member x.x.x.x 10003 encapsulation mpls
> 
> The VC retains the MTU of the physical interface and I'm not happy with that !
> 
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> With the "old" xconnect syntax under the service instance I could set MTU...
> 
> Best Regards
> 
> Andrea Pasquino
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/



More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list