[c-nsp] ME3600X-ME3800X: L2VPN new syntax cannot set MTU on PW
Jason Lixfeld
jason at lixfeld.ca
Fri May 23 09:18:34 EDT 2014
What version?
Sent from my iPhone
> On May 23, 2014, at 9:07 AM, Pasquino Andrea <andrea.pasquino at eng.it> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have working VCs (port based) with this syntax:
>
> interface GigabitEthernet0/11
> switchport trunk allowed vlan none
> switchport mode trunk
> mtu xxxx
> service instance 1 ethernet
> encapsulation untagged , dot1q 1-4094
> !
> l2vpn xconnect context xxxxx
> member GigabitEthernet0/11 service-instance 1
> member x.x.x.x 10001 encapsulation mpls
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> However I'm not able to set MTU for vlan based VCs with the same syntax:
>
> interface TenGigabitEthernet0/2
> !
> [many other service instances]
> !
> service instance 930 ethernet
> encapsulation dot1q 930
> rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric
> !
> l2vpn xconnect context 10003
> member TenGigabitEthernet0/2 service-instance 930
> member x.x.x.x 10003 encapsulation mpls
>
> The VC retains the MTU of the physical interface and I'm not happy with that !
>
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> With the "old" xconnect syntax under the service instance I could set MTU...
>
> Best Regards
>
> Andrea Pasquino
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list