[c-nsp] BGP route filtering question about upstreams

[Mark Tinka]

On Tuesday, October 07, 2014 07:41:08 PM Andrew (Andy) 
Ashley wrote:

> Could be an option but I’m guessing that AS100 will then
> only have a partial table from AS200?

Which works out fine, since you say AS100 prefers the full 
table from AS300, and does not prefer AS200 for the same.

I feel we're going round in circles :-).

> That would be nice, but neither offers communities..

That sucks... not because the upstreams don't offer 
communities, but that it limits AS100's options.

Mark.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/attachments/20141008/8c8e1589/attachment.sig>