[c-nsp] sdh over mpls

[Artem Viklenko]

15.10.2014 14:02, Jared Mauch написав(ла):
> As long as you can configure AToM xconnect you should be good. You may want to encourage them to use Ethernet instead for the lower per bit cost of that interface. 
> 
> Jared Mauch


Thnaks, Jared!

Per bit cost is another storry in this case. :)

> 
>> On Oct 15, 2014, at 6:17 AM, Artem Viklenko <artem at viklenko.net> wrote:
>>
>> Hi!
>>
>> Sorry for may be very stupid question. But googling does not
>> helps so far.
>>
>> I've got a request from customer for SDH channel between
>> two cities. At both locations we have cisco 7600's and
>> MPLS network already deployed and works fine.
>>
>> At both sides we have SIP-400 and SPA-2XOC3-POS adapters.
>> (Last time i use them 5 years ago and actually already
>> forgotten many things about SONET/SDH.)
>>
>> In general, is it enougth to build xconnect beteween two POS interfaces
>> to solve this task or we need another SPAs - SPA-1XOC3-CE for this?
>>
>>
>> Thanks in advance!
>>
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Sincerely yours,
>> Artem Viklenko.
>> _______________________________________________
>> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> 


-- 
Sincerely yours,
 Artem Viklenko.