[c-nsp] /31's on Eth p-t-p links instead of /30's

[Justin M. Streiner]

On Thu, 11 Sep 2014, CiscoNSP List wrote:

> Just trying to conserve IPv4 addresses - Has anyone run into any issues 
> with using /31's? (OSPF/BGP....anything else?)

We use /31s here in many places in a mixed Cisco/Juniper environment, and 
we have not had any problems with them.

jms