[c-nsp] Can one CSC-CE be parented to 2 CSC-PE
Sathiyan D MPLS_NOC
sathiyan.mpls at gmail.com
Fri Sep 12 06:59:37 EDT 2014
Hi,
We are trying to parent one CSC-CE to two CSC-PE. The ISP is having MPLS
and RR and we are not able to succeed. Is this technically possible.
Regards
Sath
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 4:17 PM, <cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net> wrote:
> Send cisco-nsp mailing list submissions to
> cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> cisco-nsp-request at puck.nether.net
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> cisco-nsp-owner at puck.nether.net
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of cisco-nsp digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G (Mike Hale)
> 2. Cisco SF302-08 switches (Murat Kaipov)
> 3. Re: Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G (Scott Harvanek)
> 4. Re: Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G (?ukasz Bromirski)
> 5. Re: Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G (Peter Rathlev)
> 6. Re: Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G (Peter Rathlev)
> 7. Re: partition-table and file-system type on Cisco 4500 SUP
> compact-flash (Martin T)
> 8. Issue with MPLS implementation using cisco ME-3750-24TE-M
> within our backbone (thucydide tajouo)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 08:16:54 -0700
> From: Mike Hale <eyeronic.design at gmail.com>
> To: Scott Granados <scott at granados-llc.net>
> Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAN3um4zAsHH_pEWiZ33v+bf+qh0hu7J388X0QDop6K56dAcAeQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> You should just be able to pull it out...I don't think there's a tab
> since it's held in place with the two screws. I don't remember any
> tabs on the ones I've removed.
>
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Scott Granados <scott at granados-llc.net>
> wrote:
> > Carefully as apposed to what, recklessly press the tab with a hammer?
> >
> > ;)
> >
> > On Sep 11, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >> In the instructions for removing a network module from a 3560x it
> states 'carefully press the tab on the right side of the module'.
> >>
> >> I can't seem to locate a tab on the NM-10G which releases it from the
> slot.
> >>
> >> Is it under the mounting bracket? Under the faceplate? Is anyone aware
> of where this mythical tab resides?
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> > https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> > archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>
>
>
> --
> 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 21:36:05 +0400
> From: "Murat Kaipov" <mkkaipov at gmail.com>
> To: <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [c-nsp] Cisco SF302-08 switches
> Message-ID: <002201cfcde6$e03b0450$a0b10cf0$@gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hello Guys.
>
> Did you have any experience with Cisco Small Business SF300 switches? We
> purchased few of them and now I have little trouble. I can't add this
> switches to snmp monitoring. For monitoring purposes I use PRTG v13, I try
> add snmp mib's published by Cisco on official web site, but they doesn't
> work. May one of you know how to add this switches to PRTG or any other
> snmp
> tool. I try to use Paessler MIB Importer v3 but, and I have "::=" expected
> error on line 31. I add screenshot to attachment. Can you advise something?
>
> Than you.
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 16:37:39 -0400
> From: Scott Harvanek <scott.harvanek at login.com>
> To: Mike Hale <eyeronic.design at gmail.com>, Scott Granados
> <scott at granados-llc.net>
> Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G
> Message-ID: <54120813.1000609 at login.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Same here, I do not recall any tabs.
>
> Scott H.
>
> On 9/11/14, 11:16 AM, Mike Hale wrote:
> > You should just be able to pull it out...I don't think there's a tab
> > since it's held in place with the two screws. I don't remember any
> > tabs on the ones I've removed.
> >
> > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 7:54 AM, Scott Granados <scott at granados-llc.net>
> wrote:
> >> Carefully as apposed to what, recklessly press the tab with a hammer?
> >>
> >> ;)
> >>
> >> On Sep 11, 2014, at 10:12 AM, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> In the instructions for removing a network module from a 3560x it
> states 'carefully press the tab on the right side of the module'.
> >>>
> >>> I can't seem to locate a tab on the NM-10G which releases it from the
> slot.
> >>>
> >>> Is it under the mounting bracket? Under the faceplate? Is anyone aware
> of where this mythical tab resides?
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >>> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >>> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> cisco-nsp mailing list cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> >> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> >> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
> >
> >
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 22:57:29 +0200
> From: ?ukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net>
> To: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com>
> Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G
> Message-ID: <F14F00FA-221A-462F-804C-7AD37C3133FC at bromirski.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
>
> > On 11 Sep 2014, at 16:12, Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com> wrote:
> >
> > In the instructions for removing a network module from a 3560x it states
> 'carefully press the tab on the right side of the module'.
> >
> > I can't seem to locate a tab on the NM-10G which releases it from the
> slot.
> >
> > Is it under the mounting bracket? Under the faceplate? Is anyone aware
> of where this mythical tab resides?
>
> That?s an error in the doc, it should be corrected. There?s no
> tab. You just unscrew the module and pull it.
>
> --
> "There's no sense in being precise when | ?ukasz Bromirski
> you don't know what you're talking | jid:lbromirski at jabber.org
> about." John von Neumann | http://lukasz.bromirski.net
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 23:15:38 +0200
> From: Peter Rathlev <peter at rathlev.dk>
> To: Drew Weaver <drew.weaver at thenap.com>
> Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G
> Message-ID: <1410470138.8709.3.camel at abehat.dyn.net.rm.dk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 14:12 +0000, Drew Weaver wrote:
> > I can't seem to locate a tab on the NM-10G which releases it from the
> > slot.
>
> Just repeating what others say: There's no tab to be pressed. It must be
> an error in the documentation.
>
> We just loosen the screws and pull the module in the screws.
>
> --
> Peter
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 23:19:14 +0200
> From: Peter Rathlev <peter at rathlev.dk>
> To: ?ukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net>
> Cc: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] Silly question regarding C3K-NM-10G
> Message-ID: <1410470354.8709.6.camel at abehat.dyn.net.rm.dk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
>
> On Thu, 2014-09-11 at 22:57 +0200, ?ukasz Bromirski wrote:
> > That?s an error in the doc, it should be corrected. There?s no
> > tab. You just unscrew the module and pull it.
>
> Heh, it's a detail a senior tech can use to reveal wether a junior tech
> actually read the documentation. :-)
>
> --
> Peter
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 02:12:31 +0300
> From: Martin T <m4rtntns at gmail.com>
> To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: Re: [c-nsp] partition-table and file-system type on Cisco
> 4500 SUP compact-flash
> Message-ID:
> <CAJx5YvHbQVLNtE2Vmf=OcY0J=
> 69zkWrO9U_NRxGF3hQLz1gjJg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Another utility, which should support both reading and writing to
> "Class A" file-systems, at least to some extent, is cffs:
>
> root at T60:~# cffs -v
> cffs version 0.06 (C) Simon Evans 2002 (spse at secret.org.uk)
> root at T60:~#
>
> However, it seems to refuse to support ATA-type flash-memory cards:
>
> root at T60:~# fdisk -lu /dev/sdb
>
> Disk /dev/sdb: 32 MB, 32112640 bytes
> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3 cylinders, total 62720 sectors
> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
>
> Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
> root at T60:~# cffs /dev/sdb --dir
> /dev/sdb is not an MTD character device
> root at T60:~#
>
>
> ..and detects only linear-flash cards. For example SMART 4MB linear
> flash PCMCIA card:
>
> root at T60:~# dmesg | tail -5
> [ 2756.208470] pcmciamtd 0.0: pcmcia: could not parse base and rmask0 of
> CIS
> [ 2756.212768] Found: Intel 28F016S5
> [ 2756.212773] SMART Modular Technologies 4MB FLASH Card :
> Found 2 x8 devices at 0x0 in 16-bit bank
> [ 2756.215555] erase region 0: offset=0x0,size=0x20000,blocks=32
> [ 2756.218484] pcmciamtd 0.0: mtd0: SMART Modular Technologies 4MB
> FLASH Card
> root at T60:~# cffs /dev/mtd0 --dir
> root at T60:~# cffs /dev/mtd0 --fsck
> Free space = 4194304 bytes
>
> Flash is not blank
> root at T60:~# cffs /dev/mtd0 --erase
> Size = 4194304 erase size = 131072
> 32 Erase blocks
> Proceed with erase [Y/n]Y
> Erasing block 1/32
> erase failed: Timer expired
>
>
> However, this erase operation never completes. Ciscoflash, on the
> other hand, seems not to support linear flash:
>
> root at T60:~# ciscoflash -v -d /dev/mtd0 info
> ciscoflash: Unknown magic number (0x00000000)
> root at T60:~#
>
>
> Are there "Class A" and "Class B" file-systems both on ATA-type and
> linear-type flash cards? Has anyone succesfully written to "Class A"
> file-system under Linux?
>
>
> thanks,
> Martin
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Martin T <m4rtntns at gmail.com> wrote:
> > One utility, which supports reading the "Class A" file-system, is
> > ciscoflash(http://freecode.com/projects/ciscoflash) by Simon Lockhart:
> >
> > T42 ~ # ciscoflash -d /dev/sdb dir
> > -#- --type-- --crc--- -seek-- -length- -----date/time------ name
> > 1 00000002 E81CCB85 09831C 426652 Jun 17 2013 03:56:03
> > cat4500-ios-promupgrade-122_31r_SGA7
> > T42 ~ # ciscoflash -d /dev/sdb extract
> > T42 ~ # ls -l cat4500-ios-promupgrade-122_31r_SGA7
> > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 426652 2013-06-17 17:13
> > cat4500-ios-promupgrade-122_31r_SGA7
> > T42 ~ #
> >
> > However, it does not support writing to "Class A" file-systems.
> >
> >
> > regards,
> > Martin
> >
> > 2013/6/17, Martin T <m4rtntns at gmail.com>:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> older Cisco 4500 series supervisor engines support compact flash
> >> cards. However, Cisco-branded 32MB compact-flash taken from Cisco 1800
> >> series router is not recognized by SUP:
> >>
> >> Catalyst4500#dir slot0:
> >> %Error opening slot0:/ (Bad device info block)
> >> Catalyst4500#
> >>
> >> After executing "format slot0:", the compact flash became accessible:
> >>
> >> Catalyst4500#format slot0:
> >> Format operation may take a while. Continue? [confirm]
> >> Format operation will destroy all data in "slot0:". Continue? [confirm]
> >> Enter volume ID (up to 64 chars)[default slot0]:
> >>
> >> Format of slot0 complete
> >> Catalyst4500#dir slot0:
> >> Directory of slot0:/
> >>
> >> No files in directory
> >>
> >> 31784960 bytes total (31784960 bytes free)
> >> Catalyst4500#
> >>
> >>
> >> The problem is, that now I'm not able to access this compact-flash in
> >> my PC. Looks like it even does not have a partition-table:
> >>
> >> T42 ~ # dmesg | tail
> >> [1983944.880491] ata5.00: 62720 sectors, multi 0: LBA
> >> [1983944.888476] ata5.00: configured for PIO0
> >> [1983944.888794] scsi 4:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA STI Flash
> >> 8.0.0 01/1 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
> >> [1983944.889398] sd 4:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0
> >> [1983944.891205] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] 62720 512-byte logical blocks:
> >> (32.1 MB/30.6 MiB)
> >> [1983944.891403] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
> >> [1983944.891414] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
> >> [1983944.891501] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache:
> >> enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
> >> [1983944.910031] sdb: unknown partition table
> >> [1983944.910632] sd 4:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk
> >> T42 ~ # fdisk -lu /dev/sdb
> >>
> >> Disk /dev/sdb: 32 MB, 32112640 bytes
> >> 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 3 cylinders, total 62720 sectors
> >> Units = sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> >> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> >> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> >> Disk identifier: 0x00000000
> >>
> >> Disk /dev/sdb doesn't contain a valid partition table
> >> T42 ~ # file -s /dev/sdb
> >> /dev/sdb: data
> >> T42 ~ # dd if=/dev/sdb bs=512 count=1 | hexdump -C
> >> 00000000 88 06 35 76 ea 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 04 00
> >> |..5v............|
> >> 00000010 ff ff ff ff 01 00 06 00 03 00 00 00 e5 01 00 00
> >> |................|
> >> 00000020 00 00 00 01 02 00 7c 60 00 00 00 00 02 00 c2 ff
> >> |......|`........|
> >> 00000030 00 00 3e 00 e8 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 e9 01 00 00
> >> |..>.............|
> >> 00000040 01 00 00 00 6c 73 74 6f 00 30 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> |....lsto.0......|
> >> 00000050 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> |................|
> >> *
> >> 000000a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 01 00
> >> |................|
> >> 000000b0 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff
> >> |................|
> >> *
> >> 00000100 d0 ba 1e 0b 02 00 f8 5f b8 80 ff ff ff ff ff ff
> >> |......._........|
> >> 00000110 6f 79 61 64 66 2d 6c 73 62 69 6d 2d 00 00 00 00
> >> |oyadf-lsbim-....|
> >> 00000120 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> |................|
> >> *
> >> 00000140 45 7f 46 4c 02 01 00 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> |E.FL............|
> >> 00000150 02 00 70 00 00 00 01 00 00 01 00 00 00 00 34 00
> >> |..p...........4.|
> >> 00000160 02 00 68 5e 00 00 00 00 34 00 20 00 01 00 28 00 |..h^....4.
> >> ...(.|
> >> 00000170 0a 00 09 00 00 00 01 00 01 00 00 00 00 01 00 00
> >> |................|
> >> 00000180 00 01 00 00 01 00 b4 57 29 00 a4 c2 00 00 07 00
> >> |.......W).......|
> >> 00000190 01 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> |................|
> >> 000001a0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> >> |................|
> >> *
> >> 1+0 records in
> >> 1+0 records out
> >> 512 bytes (512 B) copied, 0.0158727 s, 32.3 kB/s
> >> 00000200
> >> T42 ~ #
> >>
> >>
> >> "format" command creates a "Class A" file-system? Is this "Class A"
> >> file-system some kind of Cisco-proprietary file-system? is there a way
> >> to access this file-system under modern(2.6/3.x) Linux kernel?
> >>
> >>
> >> regards,
> >> Martin
> >>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 11:48:42 +0100
> From: thucydide tajouo <tajouo at yahoo.fr>
> To: "cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net" <cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net>
> Subject: [c-nsp] Issue with MPLS implementation using cisco
> ME-3750-24TE-M within our backbone
> Message-ID:
> <1410518922.9750.YahooMailNeo at web173003.mail.ir2.yahoo.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
>
>
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> I am planning to intergrate MPLS in our backbone using
> cisco ME-3750-24TE-M.
> For it, i have implemented a small lab with :
>
> ? 3 cisco ME-3750-24TE-M (2 provider edge and 1
> LSR)
> ? 1 WS-3550-24SMI (customer edge)
> ? 1 cisco 1720 (customer edge)
>
> To allow communication between routers (PE and CE), we are
> using OSPF as routing protocol between LSR and PE, and default routes on
> Customer edge with PE as next hop.
> All these configurations are working very well so from one
> CE (cisco 1720), we can ping another CE (WS-3550) without any problem.
>
> Note that between PE and LSR, we use VLANs interface
> (because MPLS cannot be enable on physical interfaces).
>
> Once MPLS is enabled between PE and LSR, we note that :
>
> ? From PE, we can ping any other router on the
> network
> ? From any CE, we can ping PE and LSR interfaces
> which are within MPLS backbone
> ? From one CE we cannot ping another CE
> ? From one CE we cannot ping PE interface
> connected to another CE
>
> I also note that, when implementing the same architecture
> (with 7500 routers) using GNS3 simulator, we can ping any CE from another
> CE
> with MPLS enable.
>
> So i wanted to know if there are particulars details to
> consider when implementing MPLS with ME-3750-24TE-M.
> How am i supposed to do.
>
> Need your help, please
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
>
> Thucydide TAJOUO
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list
> cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of cisco-nsp Digest, Vol 142, Issue 19
> ******************************************
>
--
With Regards,
Sathiyan D
SDE, MPLSNOC, STR,
9483539441.
More information about the cisco-nsp
mailing list