[c-nsp] power requirement for WS-X614E-GE-45AT in reverse POE mode

[Chris Evans]

This is the worst day of the year on the internet :)

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net>
wrote:

>
> > On 01 Apr 2015, at 16:30, Joe Loiacono <jloiacon at csc.com> wrote:
> >
> > "cisco-nsp" <cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net> wrote on 04/01/2015
> 09:04:04 AM:
> >
> > > From: Łukasz Bromirski <lukasz at bromirski.net>
> >
> > > > One of the local data centres is looking into this as a mechanism
> for doing
> > > > remote power supply for some section of their data centres which have
> > > > inadequate input power supply.  I'm interested to see how it will
> scale, as
> > > > obviously there are going to be some issues with UTP
> cross-connects.  I
> > > > believe they're also looking at using PoE over fibre, due to the
> higher
> > > > capacity available.  Will let you know how it pans out.
> > >
> > > PoE over fibre? Nah, you must have had misunderstood the specs.
> >
> > I'm sure he meant PoE over wireless.
>
> Yeah, but that’s for security cameras/etc - the DCs here in Europe are
> already
> deploying that kind of installations.
>
> I have to talk to my fellow TMEs in DC group, Nexus 7k with full ZX optics
> could actually
> power a lot of stuff remotely.
>
> --
> "There's no sense in being precise when |               Łukasz Bromirski
>  you don't know what you're talking     |      jid:lbromirski at jabber.org
>  about."               John von Neumann |    http://lukasz.bromirski.net
>
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
>