[c-nsp] CSR1000v as an IPSLA probe

Mack McBride mack.mcbride at viawest.com
Thu Apr 9 13:54:24 EDT 2015


Virtualized environments are not ideal for this unless they are dedicated to the task.
Ie. one VM on one physical box.
Other issues related to SLA are jitter and latency.
These can be a serious problem in a virtualized environment.
You would be much better served by getting a 2911.

http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/routers/2911-integrated-services-router-isr/index.html

If you are only concerned about reachability then a VM might work ok.
It would require tuning so that the VM associated with the CSR1000v is getting priority on
The resources, particularly network buffers.  And adjusting QoS so the ping packets
Have preference on the upstream switch.
But again, this isn't ideal.  Getting a 2911 would probably still be a better option.

Mack McBride | Network Architect | ViaWest, Inc.
O: 720.891.2502 | mack.mcbride at viawest.com | www.viawest.com | LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube

-----Original Message-----
From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of Dan Peachey
Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 10:24 AM
To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
Subject: [c-nsp] CSR1000v as an IPSLA probe

Hi,

Is anyone using a CSR1000v VM as an IPSLA probe? If so I would like to hear your experiences with it.

I'm currently evaluating it and have come out with some poor test results so far, with the main issue being tail dropped packets when CPU utilisation is above ~30%.

Regards,

Dan
_______________________________________________
cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/
This message contains information that may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected by law from disclosure. It is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s). Unless you are the addressee or authorized agent of the addressee, you may not review, copy, distribute or disclose to anyone the message or any information contained within. If you have received this message in error, please contact the sender by electronic reply and immediately delete all copies of the message.


More information about the cisco-nsp mailing list