[c-nsp] Nightmare for load balancing of L2VPN traffic on CRS (traffic from ME3600)

[Nick Hilliard]

On 15/04/2015 21:50, Daniel Verlouw wrote:
> getting offtopic, but wondering what you mean with complicated and
> hacky about the load balancing algo on Trio?
> Trio hash includes;
> - upto 5 labels
> - ipv4/v6 payload contents (and yes, it checks the packet' length to
> avoid the "4" or "6" DMAC issue)
> - for ethernet pw it can skip upto 2 vlans and still include its
> ipv4/v6 payload (if any)

basically, this.  It's not exactly obvious, and the 4/6 nibble srcmac
problem+workaround is a hack.

Nick