[c-nsp] QinQ and Bridging

[Adam Vitkovsky]

Hi Garry,

On the ASR1K I think you need to use the EFP type of config for the L2 bridging to work:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
service instance 61400 ethernet
 encapsulation dot1Q 614 second-dot1q 201
 bridge-group 201


adam
>

        Adam Vitkovsky
        IP Engineer

T:      0333 006 5936
E:      Adam.Vitkovsky at gamma.co.uk
W:      www.gamma.co.uk

This is an email from Gamma Telecom Ltd, trading as “Gamma”. The contents of this email are confidential to the ordinary user of the email address to which it was addressed. This email is not intended to create any legal relationship. No one else may place any reliance upon it, or copy or forward all or any of it in any form (unless otherwise notified). If you receive this email in error, please accept our apologies, we would be obliged if you would telephone our postmaster on +44 (0) 808 178 9652 or email postmaster at gamma.co.uk

Gamma Telecom Limited, a company incorporated in England and Wales, with limited liability, with registered number 04340834, and whose registered office is at 5 Fleet Place London EC4M 7RD and whose principal place of business is at Kings House, Kings Road West, Newbury, Berkshire, RG14 5BY.


-----Original Message-----
> From: cisco-nsp [mailto:cisco-nsp-bounces at puck.nether.net] On Behalf Of
> Garry
> Sent: 11 August 2015 05:01
> To: cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> Subject: [c-nsp] QinQ and Bridging
>
> Hi,
>
> on a multi-site installation, I've got some additional requirements to
> implement. Currently, two site (CPE) have a tagged ethernet service to a
> central site (PE). Now, apart from the L3 traffic, I need to bridge an
> additional VLAN from site 2 to site 1 in order to provide a guest WLAN
> which is terminated through a firewall at site 1.
> Our PE currently is an ASR1000 series router, the CPEs are 1941 routers
> with Security IOS licenses and additional 4-port switching card.
> configuring the QinQ as such works fine, e.g. with CPE configure with this:
>
> |interface GigabitEthernet0/1.61400 encapsulation dot1Q 614 second-dot1q
> 201 ip address 10.99.98.2 255.255.255.0 bridge-group 201|
>
> and PE with
>
> |interface GigabitEthernet0/1.61400 encapsulation dot1Q 614 second-dot1q
> 201 ip address 10.99.98.1 255.255.255.0 bridge-group 201|
>
>
> doing a ping works fine, therefore I'd expect the actual QinQ stuff working.
>
> On the CPE, I have also configured (for testing purposes) one of the
> switch interfaces on each site router as "switchport access vlan201" ,
> then added the "int vlan 201" also into bridge-group 201. IRB is active,
> bridge-group 201 is set to protocol IEEE. On the PE I have configured
> the two QinQ subinterfaces also into the same bridge-group. Anyway, none
> of the broadcasts or other L2 stuff seems to be transported between the
> sites over the QinQ bridge broup.
> I assume I'm just missing some minor thing here, but after checking docs
> and examples, I'm sort of out of ideas ... none of the docs I found use
> the combination of QinQ and bridge groups, so I'm not even sure if this
> doesn't work by design ...
>
> Any hints or ideas appreciated ...
>
> -garry
> _______________________________________________
> cisco-nsp mailing list  cisco-nsp at puck.nether.net
> https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/cisco-nsp
> archive at http://puck.nether.net/pipermail/cisco-nsp/